Urology: Low-risk prostate active surveillance
Free question published 12 August 2026
A 62-year-old man is found to have prostate cancer on biopsy: cT1c, Gleason 3+3=6 (Grade Group 1), PSA 6.2 ng/mL, with cancer in 2 of 12 cores. He has no urinary symptoms and a normal performance status. What is the most appropriate management?
- AActive surveillance
- BRadical prostatectomy
- CRadical radiotherapy with 6 months of androgen deprivation therapy
- DLow-dose-rate brachytherapy monotherapy
- EImmediate androgen deprivation therapy
Why A is correct
This is Cambridge Prognostic Group 1 (low-risk) localised disease. NICE NG131 (1.3.8) recommends offering active surveillance, considering radical prostatectomy or radical radiotherapy only if active surveillance is unsuitable or unacceptable.
And why the others are not
- BIncorrect: radical prostatectomy is only considered if active surveillance is not suitable or acceptable.
- CIncorrect: radical radiotherapy with androgen deprivation is reserved for higher-risk disease or when surveillance is declined, and ADT is not indicated in CPG 1.
- DIncorrect: brachytherapy is a radical option, not the first-line recommendation over surveillance for CPG 1 disease.
- EIncorrect: androgen deprivation therapy is not appropriate as primary treatment for low-risk localised disease.
Source NICE NG131 — Prostate cancer: diagnosis and management — National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Prostate cancer: diagnosis and management. NICE guideline NG131. Published 09/05/2019, updated 15/12/2021.
More free urology questions
- Urology: Prostate ADT duration with radical RT · 01 August 2026
- Urology: Prostate radical RT hypofractionation · 21 July 2026
2,500+ cited questions like this one are waiting in the vault.
See plans and pricing